Bridges
Amsterdam, City of Bridges
Water and bridges are of vital importance to Amsterdam’s unique position
among the historic cities of the north. Along the banks of the river
Amstel a city developed that depended on the water for its survival. At
one time water was even more important than dry land. After all, it was
the water that allowed tradesmen to transport goods from A to B; it
served to keep the enemy out and last but not least it contributed to
the beauty of the city. No wonder Amsterdam is often called the
Venice of the North.
In the course of time the number of bridges steadily increased. A
map, prepared by Cornelis Antonisz in 1544, shows that 16th century
Amsterdam had 52 bridges and 6 culverts. Pieter Bast’s map of circa 1600
includes 110 bridges and 10 culverts. As a result of the large-scale
urban expansion of the early 17th century this number nearly doubled.
When Gerred de Broen prepared his map, circa 1732, the urban expansion
projects had been completed. By then there were 297 bridges and 9
culverts.
After the 17th century expansion plans had been realised, the size of
the city remained stable until the developments which followed the
Industrial Revolution of the 19th century required a new approach. From
circa 1860 onwards Amsterdam’s territory was extended beyond the
Singelgracht and large residential areas were built to accommodate the
needs of the ever increasing population. At that time the city centre
underwent far-reaching changes as well. Several canals were filled in, a
measure initially motivated by the stench and the atrocious hygiene. At
a later stage canals were filled in in order to accommodate the needs of
modern traffic and to create adequate thoroughfares which gave access to
the newly built parts of the city. As a result many bridges were
demolished. In many other cases the steep slopes of the original bridges
were levelled to a certain extent in order to allow for the electrical
trams to pass.
Even in the 20th century many bridges were demolished, mainly in
order to meet the requirements of the ever increasing traffic. Whereas
hundreds of historic buildings were considered worth preserving, old
bridges met with an entirely different fate. They were ruthlessly
demolished and replaced by modern bridges. In our days bridges are
treated with the respect they deserve. They are part and parcel of the
ring of canals and have become historic sites in their own right. Even
though many of the bridges are no longer authentic, they are important
features of the urban set-up. The list of historic buildings and sites
now includes 72 bridges. Many of them have been placed on the list not
because of their great age and authenticity, but because they help to
shape the appearance of the Amsterdam city centre.
Historical Development
Wooden Girder Bridges
The history of Amsterdam may, from a certain perspective, be looked upon
as a history of bridges. Initially, wooden bridges were built, modelled
on the type which was common in the Dutch countryside. They served to
accommodate the needs of road traffic mainly in areas where the
east-west connections were of vital importance. Their purpose was
entirely practical. Form followed function even then. The water was
spanned by wooden beams which served as girders. Wooden planking across
the beams created an acceptable road surface. Whenever the length of the
span required extra support, one or more trusses - interconnected wooden
beams reinforced by corbel pieces - were constructed.
Not many
girder bridges survive today. Many have disappeared, others have
changed beyond recognition.
Brick Arched Bridges
The ongoing urbanisation and the increasing prosperity were instrumental
in the development of the brick bridge. Brick came to replace wood and
the arched
bridge with its elegant masonry took over from its wooden
predecessor. One or more arches (vaults), semi-circular or elliptical in
shape came to support the road surface. The arches were often
articulated by means of sandstone blocks. The approach of strictly
separating the road surface from the supporting structure below was
abandoned and bridges were now conceived of as integrated architectural
designs.
The advent of the brick arched bridge coincided with a more conscious
approach to urban development. Whereas the wooden girder bridges served
practical purposes only, arched bridges were designed to enhance the
appearance of the new city which resulted from the 1610 urban expansion
plans. Bridges became an integral part of the ring of canals.
It is true to say that brick bridges were also a status symbol.
Balthazar Florisz’ 1625 map clearly illustrates the 1610 urban expansion
plan including the bridges. All the bridges in the prestigious part of
the ring of canals (Herengracht, Keizersgracht and Brouwersgracht) were
brick bridges, whereas the Prinsengracht and the Jordaan area had to
make do with simpler wooden bridges.
Movable Bridges
The increasing prosperity and desire to underline the newly acquired
social status by beautifying the city almost certainly played an
important part in the growing popularity of the arched bridge. However,
this type of bridge had one major disadvantage as compared to its wooden
predecessor: its limited headway. In order for ships to pass through,
the captains had to lower the masts. Wooden bridges commonly had a small
movable section allowing for easy passage. Single or double
draw bridges
soon proved the answer. Pieter Bast’s map of circa 1600 shows a number
of bridges of this type with their striking balance beams and porticoes
Iron and Steel Leaf Bridges
The Industrial Revolution of the late 19th century heralded a new Golden
Age for the city of Amsterdam. The ever increasing traffic required
far-reaching adjustments to the infrastructure. Canals were filled in
and many old bridges were demolished. Besides, the electrical tram made
it necessary to level the slopes of many of the steep historical
bridges. Apart from all this the influence of new technological insights
affected the design of bridges. New ways of constructing bridges were
developed. Cast iron, weld iron and steel appeared on the scene.
The steep arched bridges were widened and levelled. From circa 1860
onwards, however, they were partly replaced by
leaf bridges.
Their flat upper sections consisted of iron or steel girders, often
flanked by columns and decorated with cast iron consoles. Gradually, the
wooden draw
bridges were replaced by steel bridges as well.
The traditional appearance of a city of arched bridges was
considerably affected by the developments outlined above. The plans were
not always supported by the public. The contemporary press printed many
disapproving comments and strong pleas to preserve the traditional
bridges. In circa 1800 there were 96 wooden and 90 stone bridges left.
By 1875 the numbers had decreased to 48 and 68 respectively. The Second
World War marked a low point with 3 wooden and 15 original stone
bridges. Between 1945 and 1982, however, the protests were taken to
heart. Dozens of leaf bridges were replaced by reconstructions of
traditional arched bridges, in an attempt to restore the old cityscape
to its former glory.
Bridges and the Amsterdam School of Architecture
In the early decades of the 20th century another turning point was
reached when the architects Piet Kramer and Johan van der Mey were
appointed advisors to the local government. They developed an entirely
different style by introducing fanciful cast iron balustrades and
sculptures into their designs which were very much part of the
mainstream of the Amsterdam School of Architecture.
Piet Kramer (1881-1961) was especially renowned for his contributions
the design of Amsterdam bridges according to the insights of the
Amsterdam School of Architecture. Between 1917 and 1952 he designed
hundreds of
leaf bridges characterised by cast iron balustrades and sculptured
land abutments. During the economic recession of the 1930s and the
Second World War architecture became more austere and insights changed
once more.