
Anneliese Marie "Anne" Frank (June 12, 1929 – February/March, 1945) was
a German-born Dutch Jewish girl who wrote a diary while in hiding with
her family and four friends in Amsterdam during the German occupation of
the Netherlands in World War II. Her family had moved to Amsterdam after
the Nazis gained power in Germany but were trapped when the Nazi
occupation extended into The Netherlands. As persecutions against the
Jewish population increased, the family went into hiding in July 1942 in
hidden rooms in her father Otto Frank's office building. After two years
in hiding the group was betrayed and transported to concentration camps.
Seven months after her arrest, Anne died of typhus in Bergen-Belsen
within days of her sister, Margot Frank. Her father, Otto, the only
survivor of the group, returned to Amsterdam after the war ended, to
find that her diary had been saved. Convinced that it was a unique
record, he took action to have it published. It was published originally
in Dutch under the name Het Achterhuis: Dagboekbrieven van 12 Juni 1942
– 1 Augustus 1944 (The Backhouse: diary notes from 12 June 1942 – 1
August 1944).
The diary, which was given to Anne Frank on her thirteenth
birthday, chronicles her life from June 12, 1942 until August 1, 1944.
It was eventually translated from its original Dutch into many languages
and became one of the world's most widely read books. There have also
been several film, television, and theatrical productions, and even an
opera, based on the diary. Described as the work of a mature and
insightful mind, it provides an intimate examination of daily life under
Nazi occupation; through her writing, Anne Frank has become one of the
most renowned and discussed of Holocaust victims.
Early life

The apartment block on the Merwedeplein where the Frank family
lived from 1934 until 1942
Anne Frank was born on June 12, 1929 in Frankfurt am Main, Germany, the
second daughter of Otto Heinrich Frank (May 12, 1889–August 19, 1980)
and Edith Holländer (January 16, 1900–January 6, 1945). Margot Frank
(February 16, 1926–February/March, 1945) was her sister. Her given name
was Annelies Marie, but to her family and friends, she was simply
"Anne". Her father sometimes called her "Annelein" ("little Anne").
The family lived in an assimilated community of Jewish and
non-Jewish citizens, and the children grew up with Catholic, Protestant,
and Jewish friends. The Franks were Reform Jews, observing many of the
traditions of the Jewish faith without observing many of its customs.
Edith Frank was the more devout parent, while Otto Frank, a decorated
German officer from World War I, was interested in scholarly pursuits
and had an extensive library; both parents encouraged the children to
read.
On March 13, 1933, elections were held in Frankfurt for the
municipal council, and Adolf Hitler's Nazi Party won. Anti-Semitic
demonstrations occurred almost immediately, and the Franks began to fear
what would happen to them if they remained in Germany. Later in the
year, Edith and the children went to Aachen, where they stayed with
Edith's mother, Rosa Holländer. Otto Frank remained in Frankfurt, but
after receiving an offer to start a company in Amsterdam, he moved there
to organise the business and to arrange accommodation for his family.
Otto Frank began working at the Opekta Works, a company which
sold the fruit extract pectin, and found an apartment on the
Merwedeplein (Merwede Square) in an Amsterdam suburb. By February 1934,
Edith and the children had arrived in Amsterdam, and the two girls were
enrolled in school--Margot in public school and Anne in a Montessori
school. Margot demonstrated ability in arithmetic, and Anne showed
aptitude for reading and writing. Her friend Hannah Goslar later
recalled that from early childhood, Anne Frank frequently wrote,
shielding her work with her hand, and refusing to discuss the content of
her writing. These early writings have not survived. Anne and Margot
were also recognized as highly distinct personalities, Margot being well
mannered, reserved, and studious, while Anne was outspoken, energetic,
and extroverted.
In 1938, Otto Frank started a second company in partnership with
Hermann van Pels, a butcher, who had fled Osnabrück in Germany with his
family. In 1939, Edith's mother came to live with the Franks, and
remained with them until her death in January 1942. In May 1940, Germany
invaded the Netherlands, and the occupation government began to
persecute Jews by the implementation of restrictive and discriminatory
laws, and the mandatory registration and segregation of Jews soon
followed. Margot and Anne were excelling in their studies and had a
large number of friends, but with the introduction of a decree that
Jewish children could only attend Jewish schools, they were enrolled at
the Jewish Lyceum.
The period chronicled in the diary
Before going into hiding

Yellow stars of the type that all Jews were required to wear
during the Nazi occupation.
For her thirteenth birthday on June 12, 1942, Anne received a small
notebook which she had pointed out to her father in a shop window a few
days earlier. Although it was an autograph book, bound with
red-and-white plaid cloth and with a small lock on the front, Anne had
already decided she would use it as a diary. She began writing in it
almost immediately, describing herself, her family and friends, her
school life, boys she flirted with and the places she liked to visit in
her neighborhood. While these early entries demonstrate that, in many
ways, her life was that of a typical schoolgirl, she also refers to
changes that had taken place since the German occupation. Some
references are seemingly casual and not emphasized. However, in some
entries Anne provides more detail of the oppression that was steadily
increasing. For instance, she wrote about the yellow star which all Jews
were forced to wear in public, and she listed some of the restrictions
and persecutions that had encroached into the lives of Amsterdam's
Jewish population.
In July 1942, Margot Frank received a call-up notice from the
Zentralstelle für jüdische Auswanderung (Central Office for Jewish
Immigration) ordering her to report for relocation to a work camp. Anne
was then told of a plan that Otto had formulated with his most trusted
employees, and which Edith and Margot had been aware of for a short
time. The family was to go into hiding in rooms above and behind the
company's premises on the Prinsengracht, a street along one of
Amsterdam's canals.
Life in the Achterhuis

The main façade of the Opekta building on the Prinsengracht in
2002. Otto Frank's offices were in the front of the building, with the
Achterhuis in the rear.

Her handwriting, translated: "This is a photo as I would wish
myself to look all the time. Then I would maybe have a chance to come to
Hollywood."
Anne Frank, 10 October 1942On the morning of Monday, July 6, 1942,[1]
the family moved into the hiding place. Their apartment was left in a
state of disarray to create the impression that they had left suddenly,
and Otto Frank left a note that hinted they were going to Switzerland.
The need for secrecy forced them to leave behind Anne's cat, Moortje. As
Jews were not allowed to use public transport, they walked several
kilometres from their home, with each of them wearing several layers of
clothing as they did not dare to be seen carrying luggage. The
Achterhuis (a Dutch word denoting the rear part of a house, translated
as the "Secret Annexe" in English editions of the diary) was a
three-story space at the rear of the building that was entered from a
landing above the Opekta offices. Two small rooms, with an adjoining
bathroom and toilet, were on the first level, and above that a large
open room, with a small room beside it. From this smaller room, a ladder
led to the attic. The door to the Achterhuis was later covered by a
bookcase to ensure it remained undiscovered. The main building, situated
a block from the Westerkerk, was nondescript, old and typical of
buildings in the western quarters of Amsterdam.
Victor Kugler, Johannes Kleiman, Miep Gies, and Bep Voskuijl were
the only employees who knew of the people in hiding, and with Gies'
husband Jan Gies and Voskuijl's father Johannes Hendrik Voskuijl, were
their "helpers" for the duration of their confinement. They provided the
only contact between the outside world and the occupants of the house,
and they kept them informed of war news and political developments. They
catered for all of their needs, ensured their safety and supplied them
with food, a task that grew more difficult with the passage of time.
Anne wrote of their dedication and of their efforts to boost morale
within the household during the most dangerous of times. All were aware
that if caught they could face the death penalty for sheltering Jews.
In late July, the Franks were joined by the van Pels family:
Hermann, Auguste, and 16-year-old Peter, and then in November by Fritz
Pfeffer, a dentist and friend of the family. Anne wrote of her pleasure
at having new people to talk to, but tensions quickly developed within
the group forced to live in such confined conditions. After sharing her
room with Pfeffer, she found him to be insufferable, and she clashed
with Auguste van Pels, whom she regarded as foolish. Her relationship
with her mother was strained, and Anne wrote that they had little in
common as her mother was too remote. Although she sometimes argued with
Margot, she wrote of an unexpected bond that had developed between them,
but she remained closest emotionally to her father. Some time later,
after first dismissing the shy and awkward Peter van Pels, she
recognised a kinship with him and the two entered a romance.
Anne spent most of her time reading and studying, while
continuing to write and edit her diary. In addition to providing a
narrative of events as they occurred, she also wrote about her feelings,
beliefs and ambitions, subjects she felt she could not discuss with
anyone. As her confidence in her writing grew, and as she began to
mature, she wrote of more abstract subjects such as her belief in God,
and how she defined human nature. She continued writing regularly until
her final entry of August 1, 1944.
Arrest and concentration camps
On the morning of August 4, 1944, the Achterhuis was stormed by
the German Security Police (Grüne Polizei) following a tip-off from an
informer who was never identified.[2] Led by Schutzstaffel
Oberscharführer Karl Silberbauer of the Sicherheitsdienst, the group
included at least three members of the Security Police. The occupants
were loaded into trucks and taken for interrogation. Victor Kugler and
Johannes Kleiman were taken away and subsequently jailed, but Miep Gies
and Bep Voskuijl were allowed to go. They later returned to the
Achterhuis, where they found Anne's papers strewn on the floor. They
collected them, as well as several family photograph albums, and Gies
resolved to return them to Anne after the war.
The members of the household were taken to the Gestapo
headquarters where they were interrogated and held overnight. On August
5, they were transferred to the Huis van Bewaring (House of Detention),
an overcrowded prison on the Weteringschans. Two days later the eight
Jewish prisoners were transported to Westerbork, The Netherlands.
Ostensibly a transit camp, by this time more than 100,000 Jews had
passed through it. Having been arrested in hiding, they were considered
criminals and were sent to the Punishment Barracks for hard labour.
On September 3, the group was deported on what would be the last
transport from Westerbork to the Auschwitz concentration camp. They
arrived after a three days' journey, and were separated by gender, with
the men and women never to see each other again. Of the 1019 passengers,
549 people-–including all children under the age of fifteen years-–were
selected and sent directly to the gas chambers where they were killed.
Anne had turned fifteen three months earlier and was spared, and
although everyone from the Achterhuis survived this selection, Anne
believed her father had been killed.

Memorial for Anne and Margot Frank at the former Bergen-Belsen
site, along with floral and pictorial tributes.
With the other females not selected for immediate death, Anne was forced
to strip naked to be disinfected, had her head shaved and was tattooed
with an identifying number on her arm. By day, the women were used as
slave labour; by night, they were crowded into freezing barracks.
Disease was rampant and before long Anne's skin became badly infected by
scabies.
On October 28, selections began for women to be relocated to
Bergen-Belsen. More than 8,000 women, including Anne and Margot Frank
and Auguste van Pels, were transported, but Edith Frank was left behind.
Tents were erected to accommodate the influx of prisoners, Anne and
Margot among them, and as the population rose, the death toll due to
disease increased rapidly. Anne was briefly reunited with two friends,
Hanneli Goslar (nicknamed "Lies" in the diary) and Nanette Blitz, who
both survived the war. Blitz described her as bald, emaciated and
shivering. Goslar said that although Anne was ill herself, she told her
that she was more concerned about Margot, whose illness seemed to be
more severe and who remained in her bunk, too weak to walk. Anne told
both her friends that she believed her parents were dead.
In March 1945, a typhus epidemic spread through the camp killing
an estimated 17,000 prisoners. Witnesses later testified that Margot
fell from her bunk in her weakened state and was killed by the shock,
and that a few days later Anne was dead too. They estimated that this
occurred a few weeks before the camp was liberated by British troops on
April 15, 1945, and although the exact dates were not recorded, it is
generally accepted to have been between the end of February and the
middle of March.
After the war, it was estimated that of the 110,000 Jews deported
from the Netherlands during the Nazi occupation, only 5,000 of them
survived.
The individual fates of the other occupants of the Achterhuis,
their helpers, and other people associated with Anne Frank, are
discussed further. See article: People associated with Anne Frank.
The Diary of A Young Girl
Publication of the diary
Cover of the diary's "Definitive Edition", 1995. The photograph
used is cropped from a school portrait of Anne Frank taken at the
Montessori School in 1941.Otto Frank survived and returned to Amsterdam.
He was informed that his wife had died and his daughters had been
transferred to Bergen-Belsen. Although he remained hopeful that they had
survived, the Red Cross in July 1945 confirmed the deaths of Anne and
Margot. It was only then that Miep Gies gave him the diary. Otto read it
and later commented that he had not realized Anne had kept such an
accurate and well-written record of their time together. Moved by her
repeated wish to be an author, he began to consider having it published.
When asked many years later to recall his first reaction he said simply,
"I never knew my little Anne was so deep".
Anne's diary began as a private expression of her thoughts and
she wrote several times that she would never allow anyone to read it.
She candidly described her life, her family and companions, and their
situation, while beginning to recognize her ambition to write fiction
for publication. In the spring of 1944, she heard a radio broadcast by
Gerrit Bolkestein—a member of the Dutch government in exile—who said
that when the war ended, he would create a public record of the Dutch
people's oppression under German occupation. He mentioned the
publication of letters and diaries, and Anne decided to submit her work
when the time came. She began editing her writing, removing sections and
rewriting others, with the view to publication. Her original notebook
was supplemented by additional notebooks and loose-leaf sheets of paper.
She created pseudonyms for the members of the household and the helpers.
The van Pels family became Hermann, Petronella, and Peter van Daan, and
Fritz Pfeffer became Albert Düssell. Otto Frank used her original diary,
known as "version A", and her edited version, known as "version B", to
produce the first version for publication. He removed certain passages,
most notably those which referred to his wife in unflattering terms, and
sections that discussed Anne's growing sexuality. Although he restored
the true identities of his own family, he retained all of the other
pseudonyms.
He gave the diary to the historian Anne Romein, who tried
unsuccessfully to have it published. She then gave it to her husband Jan
Romein, who wrote an article about it, titled "Kinderstem" ("A Child's
Voice"), published in the newspaper Het Parool on April 3, 1946. He
wrote that the diary "stammered out in a child's voice, embodies all the
hideousness of fascism, more so than all the evidence at Nuremberg put
together"[3] His article attracted attention from publishers, and the
diary was published in 1947, followed by a second run in 1950. The first
American edition was published in 1952 under the title Anne Frank: The
Diary of a Young Girl. A play based upon the diary, by Frances Goodrich
and Albert Hackett, premiered in New York City on October 5, 1955, and
later won a Pulitzer Prize for Drama. It was followed by the 1959 movie
The Diary of Anne Frank, which was a critical and commercial success.
Over the years the popularity of the diary grew, and in many schools,
particularly in the United States, it was included as part of the
curriculum, introducing Anne Frank to new generations of readers.
In 1986, the Netherlands State Institute for War Documentation
published the so-called "critical edition" of the diary. It includes
comparisons from all known versions, both edited and unedited. It also
includes discussion asserting its authentication, as well as additional
historical information relating to the family and the diary itself.
In 1999, Cornelis Suijk-—a former director of the Anne Frank
Foundation and president of the U.S. Center for Holocaust Education
Foundation-—announced that he was in the possession of five pages that
had been removed by Otto Frank from the diary prior to publication;
Suijk claimed that Otto Frank gave these pages to him shortly before his
death in 1980. The missing diary entries contain critical remarks by
Anne Frank about her parents' strained marriage, and shows Anne's lack
of affection for her mother[4]
Some controversy ensued when Suijk claimed publishing rights over
the five pages and intended to sell them to raise money for his U.S.
Foundation. The Netherlands Institute for War Documentation, the formal
owner of the manuscript, demanded the pages to be handed over. In 2000,
the Dutch Ministry of Education, Culture and Science agreed to donate
US$300,000 to Suijk's Foundation, and the pages were returned in 2001.
Since then, they have been included in new editions of the diary.
Praise for Anne Frank and the Diary
In her introduction to the diary's first American edition,
Eleanor Roosevelt described it as "one of the wisest and most moving
commentaries on war and its impact on human beings that I have ever
read". The Soviet writer Ilya Ehrenburg later said: "one voice speaks
for six million—the voice not of a sage or a poet but of an ordinary
little girl." [1] As Anne Frank's stature as both a writer and humanist
has grown, she has been discussed specifically as a symbol of the
Holocaust and more broadly as a representative of persecution. Hillary
Rodham Clinton, in her acceptance speech for an Elie Wiesel Humanitarian
Award in 1994, read from Anne Frank's diary and spoke of her "awakening
us to the folly of indifference and the terrible toll it takes on our
young," which Clinton related to contemporary events in Sarajevo,
Somalia and Rwanda.[5]
After receiving a humanitarian award from the Anne Frank
Foundation in 1994, Nelson Mandela addressed a crowd in Johannesburg,
saying he had read Anne Frank's diary while in prison and "derived much
encouragement from it." He likened her struggle against Nazism to his
struggle against apartheid, drawing a parallel between the two
philosophies with the comment "because these beliefs are patently false,
and because they were, and will always be, challenged by the likes of
Anne Frank, they are bound to fail."[6]
In her closing message in Melissa Müller's biography of Anne
Frank, Miep Gies attempted to dispel what she felt was a growing
misconception that "Anne symbolizes the six million victims of the
Holocaust", writing: "Anne's life and death were her own individual
fate, an individual fate that happened six million times over. Anne
cannot, and should not, stand for the many individuals whom the Nazis
robbed of their lives... But her fate helps us grasp the immense loss
the world suffered because of the Holocaust."
The diary has also been praised for its literary merits.
Commenting on Anne Frank's writing style, the dramatist Meyer Levin –
who worked with Otto Frank on a dramatisation of the diary shortly after
its publication[7] – praised it for "sustaining the tension of a
well-constructed novel" [2], while the poet John Berryman wrote that it
was a unique depiction, not merely of adolescence but of "the
mysterious, fundamental process of a child becoming an adult as it is
actually happening" [3]. Her biographer Melissa Müller said that she
wrote "in a precise, confident, economical style stunning in its
honesty". Her writing is largely a study of characters, and she examines
every person in her circle with a shrewd, uncompromising eye. She is
occasionally cruel and often biased, particularly in her depictions of
Fritz Pfeffer and of her own mother, and Müller explains that she
channelled the "normal mood swings of adolescence" into her writing. Her
examination of herself and her surroundings is sustained over a lengthy
period of time in an introspective, analytical and highly self critical
manner, and in moments of frustration she relates the battle being
fought within herself between the "good Anne" she wants to be, and the
"bad Anne" she believes herself to be. Otto Frank recalled his publisher
explaining why he thought the diary has been so widely read, with the
comment "he said that the diary encompasses so many areas of life that
each reader can find something that moves him personally".
In June 1999, Time Magazine published a special edition titled
TIME 100: Heroes & Icons of the 20th century. This is a list of the 20th
century's hundred most influential politicians, artists, innovators,
scientists and icons. Anne Frank was selected as one of the 'Heroes &
Icons'. The writer Roger Rosenblatt, author of Children of War, wrote
Anne Frank's entry.[8] In the article he describes her legacy:
The passions the book ignites suggest that everyone owns Anne
Frank, that she has risen above the Holocaust, Judaism, girlhood and
even goodness and become a totemic figure of the modern world — the
moral individual mind beset by the machinery of destruction, insisting
on the right to live and question and hope for the future of human
beings.
Denials and legal action
Efforts have been made to discredit the diary since its
publication, and since the mid 1970s Holocaust denier David Irving has
been consistent in his assertion that the diary is not genuine.[9]
Continued public statements made by such Holocaust deniers prompted
Teresien da Silva to comment on behalf of Anne Frank House in 1999, "for
many right-wing extremists (Anne) proves to be an obstacle. Her personal
testimony of the persecution of the Jews and her death in a
concentration camp are blocking the way to a rehabilitation of national
socialism".
Since the 1950s, Holocaust denial has been a criminal offence in
several European countries, including Germany, and the law has been used
to prevent a rise in neo-Nazi activity. In 1959, Otto Frank took legal
action in Lübeck against Lothar Stielau, a school teacher and former
Hitler Youth member who published a school paper that described the
diary as a forgery. The court examined the diary, and, in 1960, found it
to be genuine. Stielau recanted his earlier statement, and Otto Frank
did not pursue the case any further.
In 1958, Simon Wiesenthal was challenged by a group of protesters
at a performance of The Diary of Anne Frank in Vienna who asserted that
Anne Frank had never existed, and who told Wiesenthal to prove her
existence by finding the man who had arrested her. He began searching
for Karl Silberbauer and found him in 1963. When interviewed,
Silberbauer readily admitted his role, and identifed Anne Frank from a
photograph as one of the people arrested. He provided a full account of
events and recalled emptying a briefcase full of papers onto the floor.
His statement corroborated the version of events that had previously
been presented by witnesses such as Otto Frank.
In 1976, Otto Frank took action against Heinz Roth of Frankfurt,
who published pamphlets stating the diary was a forgery. The judge ruled
that if he published further statements he would be subjected to a
500,000 Deutschmark fine and a six months' jail sentence. Two cases were
dismissed by German courts in 1978 and 1979 on the grounds of freedom of
speech, as the complaint was not filed by an "injured party". The court
ruled in each case that if a further complaint was made by an injured
party, such as Otto Frank, a charge of slander could follow.
The controversy reached its peak with the arrest and trial of two
neo-Nazis, Ernst Römer and Edgar Geiss, who were tried and found guilty
of producing and distributing literature denouncing the diary as a
forgery, following a complaint by Otto Frank. During their appeal, a
team of historians examined the documents in consultation with Otto
Frank, and determined them to be genuine. In 1978, as part of an appeal
of the cases won against Römer and Geiss, the German Criminal Court
Laboratory, the Bundeskriminalamt (BKA) was asked to examine the kind of
paper and the types of ink used in the manuscript of the diary. Although
its findings indicated that ink with which the diary was written had
been in use during the war, the BKA also concluded that "the later
corrections made on the loose-leaf pages were written in part in black,
green and blue ballpoint pen," though the BKA did not give any specific
details about these alleged ballpoint corrections. Deniers of the
authenticity of the diary focused in particular on this statement, as
ballpoint pens did not become widely available until after the end of
the World War II.
In 1986, the Dutch "Gerechtelijk Laboratorium" (State Forensic
Science Laboratory) in Rijswijk conducted another extensive technical
examination of the manuscript. Though the BKA was invited by the "Gerechtelijk
Laboratorium" to indicate where on the loose-leaf pages it had found the
"ballpoint corrections", the BKA was unable to point out a single
example. The "Gerechtelijk Laboratorium" itself found only two slips of
paper in ballpoint ink which had been inserted in Anne Frank's loose
leaf manuscript. The Revised Critical Edition of the Diary of Anne Frank
(published 2003) reproduces images (pages 167-171) of the two slips of
paper, and in the chapter summarising the findings of the State Forensic
Science Laboratory which analysed the materials, ink and handwriting in
the manuscripts of Anne Frank, H.J.J. Hardy writes on the matter:
The only ballpoint writing was found on two loose scraps of paper
included among the loose sheets. Figures VI-I-I and 3 show the way in
which these scraps of paper had been inserted into the relevant plastic
folders. As far as the factual contents of the diary are concerned the
ballpoint writings have no significance whatsoever. Morever, the
handwriting on the scraps of paper and in the diary differs
strikingly.(page 167)
A footnote on this page adds:
The Hamburg psychologist and court-appointed handwriting expert
Hans Ockleman stated in a letter to the Anne Frank Fonds dated September
27 1987 that his mother, Mrs Dorothea Ockleman wrote the ballpoint texts
in question when she collaborated with Mrs Minna Becker in investigating
the diaries.
With Otto Frank's death in 1980, the original diary, including
letters and loose sheets, had been willed to the Netherlands Institute
for War Documentation, who commissioned a forensic study of the diary
through the Netherlands Ministry of Justice in 1986. They examined the
handwriting against known exemplars and found that they matched, and
determined that the paper, glue and ink were readily available during
the time the diary was said to have been written. Their final
determination was that the diary is authentic. On March 23, 1990, the
Hamburg Regional Court confirmed its authenticity.
Nevertheless, Holocaust deniers have been persistent in their
claims that the diaries were forged. In 1991, Robert Faurisson and
Siegfried Verbeke produced a booklet titled: The Diary of Anne Frank: A
Critical Approach. It claimed that Otto Frank wrote the diary, based on
assertions that the diary contained several contradictions, that hiding
in the Achterhuis would have been impossible, and that the style and
handwriting of Anne Frank were not those of a teenager.
In December 1993, the Anne Frank House in Amsterdam and the Anne
Frank Funds in Basle instigated a civil law suit in order to prohibit
the further distribution of The Diary of Anne Frank: A Critical Approach
in the Netherlands. On December 9, 1998, the Amsterdam District Court
ruled in favour of the claimants, forbade any further denial of the
authenticity of the diary and unsolicited distribution of publications
to that effect, and imposed a penalty of 25,000-guilders per
infringement.[10]
Legacy
Statue of Anne Frank, by Mari Andriessen, outside the Westerkerk
in Amsterdam.On May 3, 1957, a group of citizens including Otto Frank
established the Anne Frank Foundation in an effort to rescue the
Prinsengracht building from demolition and to make it accessible to the
public. Otto Frank insisted that the aim of the foundation would be to
foster contact and communication between young people of different
cultures, religions or racial backgrounds, and to oppose intolerance and
racial discrimination.
The Anne Frank House opened on May 3, 1960. It consists of the
Opekta warehouse and offices and the Achterhuis, all unfurnished so that
visitors can walk freely through the rooms. Some personal relics of the
former occupants remain, such as movie star photographs glued by Anne to
a wall, a section of wallpaper on which Otto Frank marked the height of
his growing daughters, and a map on the wall where he recorded the
advance of the Allied Forces, all now protected behind Perspex sheets.
From the small room which was once home to Peter van Pels, a walkway
connects the building to its neighbours, also purchased by the
Foundation. These other buildings are used to house the diary, as well
as changing exhibits that chronicle different aspects of the Holocaust
and more contemporary examinations of racial intolerance in various
parts of the world. It has become one of Amsterdam's main tourist
attractions, and is visited by more than half a million people each
year.
In 1963, Otto Frank and his second wife Elfriede
Geiringer-Markovits set up the Anne Frank Fonds as a charitable
foundation, based in Basel, Switzerland. The Fonds raises money to
donate to causes "as it sees fit". Upon his death, Otto willed the
diary's copyright to the Fonds, on the provison that the first 80,000
Swiss francs in income each year was to be distributed to his heirs, and
any income above this figure was to be retained by the Fonds to use for
whatever projects its administrators considered worthy. It provides
funding for the medical treatment of the Righteous Among the Nations on
a yearly basis. It has aimed to educate young people against racism and
has loaned some of Anne Frank's papers to the United States Holocaust
Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C. for an exhibition in 2003. Its
annual report of the same year gave some indication of its effort to
contribute on a global level, with its support of projects in Germany,
Israel, India, Switzerland, the United Kingdom and the United States[11]
Elementary schools in both Dallas, Texas (Dallas ISD) and in
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (School District of Philadelphia) have been
named "Anne Frank Elementary School" for her.
|