GREEK
ARCHITECTURE
Architecture (building executed to an aesthetically considered design) was
extinct in Greece from the end of the Mycenaean period (about 1200 BC) until
the 7th century, when urban life and prosperity recovered to a point where
public building could be undertaken. But since most Greek buildings in the
Archaic and Early Classical periods were made of wood or mud-brick, nothing
remains of them except a few ground-plans, and there are almost no written
sources on early architecture or descriptions of buildings.
Most of our knowledge of Greek architecture comes from the few surviving
buildings of the Classical, Hellenistic and Roman periods (since Roman
architecture heavily copied Greek), and from late written sources such as
Vitruvius (1st century AD). This means that there is a strong bias towards
temples, the only buildings which survive in any number.
The standard format of Greek public buildings is well known from
surviving examples such as the Parthenon, and even more so from Roman
buildings built partly on the Greek model, such as the Pantheon in Rome. The
building was usually either a cube or a rectangle made from limestone, of
which Greece has an abundance, and which was cut into large blocks and
dressed. Marble was an expensive building material in Greece: high quality
marble came only from Mt Pentelus in Attica and from a few islands such as
Paros, and its transportation in large blocks was difficult. It was used
mainly for sculptural decoration, not structurally, except in the very
grandest buildings of the Classical period such as the Parthenon.
There were two main styles (or "orders") of Greek architecture, the Doric
and the Ionic. These names were used by the Greeks themselves, and reflected
their belief that the styles descended from the Dorian and Ionian Greeks of
the Dark Ages, but this is unlikely to be true. The Doric style was used in
mainland Greece and spread from there to the Greek colonies in Italy. The
Doric style was more formal and austere, the Ionic more relaxed and
decorative.
The more ornate Corinthian style was a later development of the Ionic.
These styles are best known through the three orders of column capitals, but
there are differences in most points of design and decoration between the
orders.
Most of the best known surviving Greek buildings, such as the Parthenon
and the Temple of Hephaestus in Athens, are Doric.
The Erechtheum, next to the Parthenon, however, is Ionic. The Ionic order
became dominant in the Hellenistic period, since its more decorative style
suited the aesthetic of the period better than the more restrained Doric.
Some of the best surviving Hellenistic buildings, such as the Library of
Celsus, can be seen in Turkey, at cities such as Ephesus and Pergamum. But
in the greatest of Hellenistic cities, Alexandria in Egypt, almost nothing
survives.
Until the age of Alexander the Great, the Greeks erected permanent stone
buildings almost exclusively for religious monuments, like the Egyptians,
Sumerians, and Hindus. Their temples were not large enclosures of space but
statue chambers containing a god's sacred image. These chambers were
accessible only to priests.
Yet the Greek temple has always been seen as fundamentally distinct from
and superior to most other early religious types, partly because of the
simplicity of its form, partly because of the exquisite refinement of the
best examples, and partly because it is seen to reflect the emergence in
Greece of a rational, philosophical approach to art that replaced earlier
belief systems.
Three Styles of Greek Temples
Ionic, evolved in Ionia on the eastern shore of the Aegean Sea

The Ionic style is thinner and more elegant. Its capital is
decorated with a scroll-like design (a volute). This style was found in
eastern Greece. The Ionic style was used in the cities of Ionia (now the
west coast of Turkey) and some of the Aegean islands.
The Ionic order forms one of the three orders or organizational systems
of classical architecture, the other two canonic orders being the Doric and
the Corinthian. (There are two lesser orders, the stocky Tuscan order and
the rich variant of Corinthian, the Composite order, added by 16th century
Italian architectural theory and practice.)
The Ionic order originated in the mid-6th century BC in Ionia, the
southwestern coastland and islands of Asia Minor settled by Ionian Greeks,
where an Ionian dialect was spoken. The Ionic order was being practised in
mainland Greece in the 5th century BC. The first of the great Ionic temples,
though it stood for only a decade before an earthquake levelled it, was the
Temple of Hera on Samos, built about 570 BC - 560 BC by the architect
Rhoikos. It was in the great sanctuary of the goddess: it could scarcely
have been in a more prominent location for its brief lifetime. A
longer-lasting 6th century Ionic temple was the Temple of Artemis at
Ephesus, one of the Seven
Wonders of the World.
Unlike the Greek Doric order, Ionic columns normally stand on a base
which separates the shaft of the column from the stylobate or platform. The
capital of the Ionic column has characteristic paired scrolling volutes that
are laid on the molded cap ("echinus") of the column, or spring from within
it.
The cap is usually enriched with egg-and-dart. Originally the volutes lay
in a single plane (illustration at right); then it was seen that they could
be angled out on the corners.
This feature of the Ionic order made it more pliant and satisfactory than
the Doric to critical eyes in the 4th century BC: angling the volutes on the
corner columns, ensured that they "read" equally when seen from either front
or side facade.
The 16th-century Renaissance architect and theorist Vincenzo Scamozzi
designed a version of such a perfectly four-sided Ionic capital, which
became so much the standard, that when a Greek Ionic order was eventually
reintroduced, in the later 18th century Greek Revival, it conveyed an air of
archaic freshness and primitive, perhaps even republican, vitality.
Below the volutes, the Ionic column may have a wide collar or banding
separating the capital from the fluted shaft. Or a swag of fruit and flowers
may swing from the clefts of the volutes, or from their "eyes".
After a little early experimentation, the number of hollow flutes in the
shaft settled at 24.
This standardization kept the fluting in a familiar proportion to the
diameter of the column at any scale, even when the height of the column was
exaggerated.
Roman fluting leaves a little of the column surface between each hollow;
Greek fluting runs out to a knife edge that was easily scarred.
The Ionic column is always more slender than the Doric: Ionic columns are
eight and nine column-diameters tall, and even more in the Antebellum
colonnades of late American Greek revival plantation houses.
Ionic columns are most often fluted: Inigo Jones introduced a note of
sobriety with plain Ionic columns on his Banqueting House at Whitehall
Palace, London, and when Beaux-Arts architect John Russell Pope wanted to
convey the manly stamina combined with intellect of Theodore Roosevelt, he
left colossal Ionic columns unfluted on the Roosevelt memorial at the
American Museum of Natural History, New York, for an unusual impression of
strength and stature.
The major feature of the Ionic order are the volutes of its capital,
which have been the subject of much theoretical and practical discourse,
based on a brief and obscure passage in Vitruvius. The only tools required
were a straightedge, a right angle, string (to establish half-lengths) and a
compass.
The entablature resting on the columns has three parts: a plain
architrave divided into two, or more generally three, bands, with a frieze
resting on it that may be richly sculptural, and a cornice bult up with
dentils (like the closely-spaced ends of joists), with a corona ("crown")
and cyma ("ogee") molding to support the projecting roof. Pictorial often
narrative bas-relief frieze carving provides a characteristic feature of the
Ionic order, in the area where the Doric order is articulated with
triglyphs.
Roman and Renaissance practice condensed the height of the entablature by
reducing the proportions of the architrave, which made the frieze more
prominent.
Vitruvius, a practicing architect who worked in the time of Augustus,
reports (De Architectura, iv) that the Doric has a basis of sturdy male body
proportions while Ionic depends on "more graceful" female body proportions.
Though he does not name his source for such a self-conscious and "literary"
approach, it must be in traditions passed on from Hellenistic architects,
such as Hermogenes of Priene, the architect of a famed temple of Artemis at
Magnesia on the Meander in Lydia (now Turkey).
Renaissance architectural theorists took his hints, to interpret the
Ionic Order as matronly in comparison to the Doric Order, though not as
wholly feminine as the Corinthian order.
The Ionic is a natural order for post-Renaissance libraries and courts of
justice, learned and civilized. Because no treatises on classical
architecture survive earlier than that of Vitruvius, identification of such
meaning in architectural elements in the 5th and 4th centuries BC remains
tenuous, though in the Renaissance it became part of the conventional
"speech' of classicism.
The Parthenon, although it conforms mainly to the Doric order, also has
some Ionic elements. A more purely Ionic mode on the Athenian Acropolis is
exemplified in the Erechtheum.
From the 17th century onwards, a much admired and copied version of Ionic
was that which could be seen in the temple called that of "Fortuna Virilis"
in Rome, first clearly presented in a detailed engraving in Antoine
Desgodetz, Les edifices antiques de Rome (Paris 1682).
Reference
Doric
The Doric order was one of the three orders or organizational systems of
Ancient Greek or classical architecture; the other two orders were the Ionic
and the Corinthian. The Greek Doric order was the earliest of these, known
from the 7th century BC and reaching its mature form in the 5th century
BC.In their original Greek version, Doric columns stood directly on the flat
pavement (the stylobate) of a temple without a base; their vertical shafts
were fluted with parallel concave grooves; and they were topped by a smooth
capital that flared from the column to meet a square abacus at the
intersection with the horizontal beam ("entablature") that they carried.
A pronounced feature of both Greek and Roman versions of the Doric order
are the triglyphs and metopes. The triglyphs are decoratively grooved and
represent the original wooden end-beams, which rest on the plain frieze that
occupies the lower half of the entablature. Under each triglyph are peglike
guttae that appear as if they were hammered in from below to stabilize the
post-and-beam ("trabeated") construction.
A triglyph is centered above every column, with another (or sometimes
two) between columns, though the Greeks felt that the corner triglyph should
form the corner of the entablature, creating an inharmonious mismatch with
the supporting column. The spaces between the triglyphs are the metopes.
They may be left plain, or they may be carved in low relief. Because the
metopes are somewhat flexible in their proportions, the modular space
between columns ("intercolumniation") can be adjusted by the architect.
Often the last two columns were set slightly closer together, to give a
subtle visual strengthening to the corners.
Early examples of the Doric order include the temples at Paestum, in
southern Italy, a region called Magna Graecia, which was settled by Greek
colonists and retained a strongly Hellenic culture.
The Temple of the Delians is a "peripteral" Doric temple, the largest of
three dedicated to Apollo on the island of Delos. It was begun in 478 BC and
never completely finished. During their period of independence from Athens,
the Delians reassigned the temple to the island of Poros. It is "hexastyle",
with six columns across the pedimented end and thirteen along each long
face.
All the columns are centered under a triglyph in the frieze, except for
the corner columns. The plain, unfluted shafts on the columns stand directly
on the platform (the stylobate), without bases. The recessed "necking" at
the top of the shafts and the wide cushionlike echinus are a slightly
self-conscious archaizing features, for Delos is Apollo's ancient
birthplace.
A classic statement of the Greek Doric order is the Temple of Hephaestus
in Athens, built about 449 BC. The contemporary Parthenon, the largest
temple in classical Athens, is also in the Doric order, although the
sculptural enrichment is more familiar in the Ionic order: the Greeks were
never as doctrinaire in the use of the Classical vocabulary as Renaissance
theorists or neoclassical architects. The detail (illustration, left), part
of the basic vocabulary of trained architects from the later 18th century
onwards, shows how the width of the metopes was flexible: here they bear the
famous bas-relief sculptures of the battle of Lapiths and Centaurs.
In the Roman Doric version (illustration, right), the height of the
entablature has been reduced. The endmost triglyph is centered over the
column rather than occupying the corner of the architrave. The columns are
slightly less robust in their proportions. Below their caps, an astragal
molding encircles the column like a ring. Crown moldings soften transitions
between frieze and cornice and emphasize the upper edge of the abacus. Roman
Doric columns also have moldings at their bases and stand on low square pads
or are even raised on plinths. In the Roman Doric mode, columns are not
invariably fluted.
The Roman architect Vitruvius, following contemporary practice, outlined
in his treatise the procedure for laying out constructions based on a
module, which he took to be one half a column's diameter, taken at the base.
An illustration of Andrea Palladio's Doric order, as it was laid out, with
modules identified, by Isaac Ware, in The Four Books of Palladio's
Architecture (London, 1738) is illustrated at Vitruvian module.When
Greek Revival architecture was introduced at the beginning of the 19th
century, the Greek Doric order had not previously been widely used. The
first engraved illustrations of the Greek Doric order dated to the mid-18th
century.
Its appearance in the new phase of Classicism brought with it new
connotations of high-minded primitive simplicity, seriousness of purpose,
noble sobriety, and - in the United States - Republican virtues. In a
customs house, Greek Doric suggested incorruptibility; in a Protestant
church a Greek Doric porch promised a return to an untainted early church;
it was equally appropriate for a library, a bank or a trustworthy public
utility.
Reference
Corinthian
The Corinthian order is one of the Classical orders of Greek and Roman
architecture, although it was seldom used in Greek architecture. The other
two orders were the Doric and the Ionic. (When classical architecture was
revived, two more orders were added to the canon, the Tuscan order and the
Composite order.)
The Corinthian order was said to have been invented by an architect,
Callimachus, who was inspired by the sight of a votive basket that had been
left on the grave of a young girl. A few of her toys were in it, and a
square tile had been placed over the basket, to protect them from the
weather. An acanthus plant had grown through the woven basket, mixing its
spiny, deeply cut leaves with the weave of the basket. Or so Vitruvius said.
Claude Perrault incorporated a vignette of the tale in his illustration of
the Corinthian order for his translation of Vitruvius, published in Paris,
1684. Perrault demonstrates in his engraving how the proportions of the
carved capital could be adjusted according to demands of the design, without
offending. The texture and outline of Perrault's leaves is dry and tight
compared to their 19th-century naturalism at the U.S. Capitol.
A Corinthian capital may be seen as an enriched development of the Ionic
capital, though one may have to look closely at a Corinthian capital to see
the Ionic volutes at the corners, perhaps reduced in size and importance,
scrolling out above the two ranks of leaves, and the smaller volutes
scrolling inwards to meet each other on each side. The leaves may be quite
stiff, schematic and dry, or they may be extravagantly undercut,
naturalistic and spiky.
In Late Antique and Byzantine practice, the leaves may be blown sideways,
as if by the wind of Faith. Unlike the Doric and Ionic column capitals, a
Corinthian capital has no neck beneath it, just a ring-like astragal molding
or a banding that forms the base of the capital, recalling the base of the
legendary basket.
The Corinthian column is almost always fluted. If it is not, it is often
worth pausing to unravel the reason why (sometimes simply a tight budget).
Even the flutes of a Corinthian column may be enriched. They may be
filleted, with rods nestled within the hollow flutes, or stop-fluted, with
the rods rising a third of the way, to where the entasis begins.
The French like to call these chandelles and sometimes they end them
literally with carved wisps of flame, or with bellflowers. Alternately,
beading or chains of husks may take the place of the fillets in the fluting,
for Corinthian is the most playful and flexible of the orders. Its
atmosphere is rich and festive, with more opportunities for variation than
the other orders.
In its proportions, the Corinthian column is similar to the Ionic column,
though it may be made more slender, but it stands apart by its distinctive
carved capital. The abacus upon the capital has concave sides to conform to
the outscrolling corners of the capital, and it may have a rosette at the
center of each side.
The architrave is divided in two or three sections, which may be equal,
or they may bear interesting proportional relationships, one with another.
At the U.S. Capitol's extension, the proportions are exactly 1:1. Above the
plain, unadorned architrave lies the frieze, which may be richly carved with
a continuous design. Above that, the profiles of the cornice moldings are
like those of the Ionic order. If the cornice is very deep, it may be
supported by brackets or modillions, ornamental brackets used in a series
under a cornice.
The oldest known example of a Corinthian column is in the Temple of
Apollo Epicurius at Bassae in Arcadia, ca 450420 BCE. It is not part of the
order of the temple itself, which has a Doric colonnade surrounding the
termple and an Ionic order within the cella enclosure. A single Corinthian
column stands free, centered within the cella. Quite mysterious, and the
archaeologists debate what it is all about: perhaps a votive column? A few
examples of Corinthian columns in Greece during the next century are all
used inside temples. A more famous example, and the first documented use of
the Corinthian order on the exterior of a structure, is the circular
Choragic Monument of Lysicrates in Athens, erected ca 334 BCE.
The Corinthian order really came into its own in Roman practice, however,
as at the Maison Carrée, Nimes.
Most buildings (and most clients) are satisfied with just two orders.
When orders are superposed one above another, as they are at the Flavian
Amphitheater - the Colosseum - the natural progression is from sturdiest and
plainest (Doric) at the bottom, to slenderest and richest (Corinthian) at
the top. The Colosseum's topmost tier has an unusual order that came to be
known as the Composite order during the 16th century.
The mid-16th century Italians, especially Sebastiano Serlio and Vignola,
who established a canonic version of the orders, thought they detected a
"Composite order," combining the volutes of the Ionic with the foliage of
the Corinthian, but in Roman practice volutes were almost always present.
During the 16th century, a sequence of engravings of the orders in
architectural treatises helped standardize their details within rigid
limits. Sebastiano Serlio; the Regola delli cinque ordini of Giacomo Barozzi
da Vignola (1507-1573); the Quattro libri di Architettura of Andrea
Palladio, and Vincenzo Scamozzi's Idea della Architettura Universale, were
followed in the 17th century by French treatises with further refined
engraved models, such as Perrault's.
Reference

|